Vietnam Veterans of America  
  The VVA Veteran® Online  
  homepipeAboutpipeArchivepipeSubscribepipeContactpipevva.orgVVA gifFacebookContact    
November/December 2022 -   -  

What Would JFK Have Done? The Latest in the Long Debate

Historians don’t like what-ifs. But historical what-ifs often are intriguing and can be instructive, and that is the case with at least four dealing with the long road that brought the United States into the Vietnam War.  

The first goes back to 1919 and the Paris Peace Talks following World War I. Despite the fact that U.S. President Woodrow Wilson espoused self-determination of peoples, the State Department never responded to a petition from a young Vietnamese revolutionary leader who came to Versailles seeking help to free his country from French colonial rule. What if the Wilson Administration hadn’t ignored Ho Chi Minh?

Fast-forward to 1945 and the waning days of World War II. Ho Chi Minh and his Viet Minh guerrilla army were working with the OSS, the forerunner of the CIA, in northern Vietnam fighting a guerrilla war against the Japanese who occupied French Indochina. After the war ended, Ho again asked the U.S. to support his fight to free Vietnam from French colonial rule. What if the U.S. had taken him up on that offer?

In 1963, the Kennedy Administration all but orchestrated a coup that overthrew Ngo Dinh Diem, the autocratic anticommunist president of South Vietnam. Diem and his brother Ngo Dinh Nu were assassinated and the country fell into years of political instability just as North Vietnam and the Viet Cong revved up their fight against South Vietnam. What if the U.S. had continued to support the Diem regime?

Then there’s this other 1963 what if: What would President John F. Kennedy have done in Vietnam if he had not been assassinated in 1963, just weeks after Diem was overthrown? Specifically, Would he have increased the force about 15,000 American troops (euphemistically called advisers) or withdrawn them incrementally as he had begun to do?

Kennedy and Johnson administration alumni and others have long debated that one. JFK partisans believe he would have continued to withdraw troops and the U.S. would not have escalated the war. LBJ supporters contend that faced with the military and political state of affairs in South Vietnam in 1964 and 1965—and with his strong hawkish Cold War views—Kennedy would have ratcheted up American involvement.

The latest and most complete examination of the JFK what if is Marc J. Selverstone’s The Kennedy Withdrawal: Camelot and the American Commitment to Vietnam (Harvard University Press, 336 pp. $35). In this worthy book, Selverstone, who heads the Presidential Recordings Program at the University of Virginia’s Miller Center, takes a deep dive into whether or not Kennedy would have greatly escalated the war as Johnson did within two years after assuming the presidency.

Selverstone makes it clear that he is more interested in showing what happened before Kennedy’s death than in providing an answer to the what if. As he puts it: The book “seeks to trace [JFK’s Vietnam War policy’s] history, focusing more on its meaning at the time than on whether Kennedy would have carried it out.” In setting out that history Selverstone hones in on how Kennedy’s Vietnam War planning began, “why it ended, and what it meant.” In doing so, he thoroughly analyzes the historical evidence (including the JFK and LBJ White House tapes) and comes to no definitive conclusion, saying that the answer is “ultimately unknowable.”

That said, Selverstone decidedly leans toward the theory that JFK (and Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara), having terminated withdrawing troops before Kennedy’s death, likely would have done something akin to LBJ’s escalation. JFK, Selverstone reminds us, “never relinquished his interest in brushfire wars, nor did he dampen his rhetoric about their necessity.”

Plus, Kennedy’s closest advisers—including his “longtime counselor” Ted Sorensen, his main Vietnam War policy aide Michael Forrestal, and his brother Robert F. Kennedy, “conceded that JFK, at the time he went to Dallas, probably did not know what he would do if faced with Saigon’s ultimate collapse.” Bobby Kennedy, Selverstone points out, “said much the same, telling interviewers in the spring of 1964 that the matter would simply await their judgment. ‘We’d face that when we came to it.’”

To his dying day, JFK “continued to operate from a worldview that embraced the precepts of domino [theory] thinking [and] the demonstration of resolve. While he vented in private about the commitment to Saigon—one he inherited but championed all the same—he never disowned the strategic logic on which it rested.”

This revealing book won’t end the JFK what if debate, but it will provide intriguing food for thought about what Kennedy likely would have done in Vietnam had he lived.


No surprise that one of the chapters in former Nixon Secretary of State and National Security Adviser Henry Kissinger’s new book Leaders: Six Studies in World Strategy (Penguin Press, 528 pp., $46, $15.99, Kindle), is devoted to the man he served in the White House.

That’s because lionizing Nixon has been Kissinger’s MO since 1974 when Nixon resigned in disgrace, and especially after the Vietnam War came to an inglorious end for the South Vietnamese in 1975. In a raft of books, journal and magazine articles, speeches, and opinion pieces, Kissinger has tried to make the case that Nixon was one of the world’s great leaders and that his main foreign policy guy (himself) was a towering geopolitical genius.

Nixon, until his death in 1994, also spent considerable time rewriting his role in American Vietnam War history. To hear them tell it, Nixon and Kissinger were saintly peacemakers who failed at gaining “peace with honor” because a murderers’ row of evildoers—the North Vietnamese, the Viet Cong, the South Vietnamese, the American news media, the American antiwar movement, college students, “the elites,” a hostile U.S. Congress, and the unpleasantness called Watergate—thwarted them at virtually every turn.

We get more of that in Kissinger’s new book in which he tells the world that Nixon had a plan to end America’s role in the war, but it took three years and 20,000 or so American lives to implement it. Then, two years later—through no fault of his own—South Vietnam went down in flames.

Kissinger adds that the Nixon and Kissinger prosecution of the Vietnam War started the “internal division of American society that has torn it to this day.” His remedy is calling for “common purpose and reconciliation.” That’s an all-but-impossible task for those of us who vividly remember Kissinger’s long, disastrous record of Vietnam War obfuscations, disingenuousness, and hubris.


Vector to Destiny: Journey of a Vietnam F-4 Fighter Pilot 
by George W. Kohn

Vector to Destiny: Journey of a Vietnam F-4 Fighter Pilot (Koehler Books, 274 pp., $16.84, hardcover, $18.95, paper; $7.49, Kindle) fits comfortably inside the age-old Horatio Alger rags-to-riches stories. In this war memoir, George Kohn writes about his rise from a farm boy educated in a one-room schoolhouse to flying USAF F-4 Phantoms in the Vietnam War in 1969-70. To his credit, Kohn climbed the ladder of his dreams on his own God-given initiative.

While still a child, Kohn rose well before school hours to perform demanding farm chores. On several mornings while milking cows, he heard a low-flying B-58 Hustler bomber’s “earth-vibrating, thunderous boom that drowned out all the other sounds.” That also heralded a message: the Wisconsin farm boy’s destiny would be to fly an airplane like that one.

In telling his story, Kohn — a VVA life member — sets out in detail the many difficult tasks he accomplished in overcoming the conventions of farm life and hardship of an inferior education. He found a path through his high school’s pecking order and at the University of Wisconsin, as well as ROTC and summer camp, pilot training, survival school, and F-4 familiarization. It all culminated in his assignment to fly with the 366th Tactical Fighter Wing out of Da Nang in November 1969.

Along the way, he records his thoughts about the Vietnam War era, lauding the good and castigating the bad within America’s political structure and among his peers. His war stories do not begin until well into Part Five of the book.

In 201 missions as an F-4 back-seater, Kohn bombed the Ho Chi Minh Trail in Laos, supply depots in Cambodia, and the city of Vinh when the Nixon Administration resumed attacks on North Vietnam in 1970. In most cases, his combat action centered on problem-solving, in which logic dominated emotion. He got pissed off, but practiced restraint by repeatedly reminding himself how lucky he was to be where he was.

Vector to Destiny will appeal to readers with limited knowledge of Air Force activities; in other words, those who would benefit from reading about military tasks step by step—everything from classroom demands to test flying an F-4 at Mach 2. Old timers might view those details as overkill.

To me, Kohn’s boyhood farm activities are as interesting as his combat stories, maybe more so. They definitely fulfill the book’s rags-to-riches theme. Of course, I reacted to the country scenes as a kid who grew up in Pittsburgh and who once believed that vegetables grew in plastic crates at Kroger.




-May/June 2022March/April 2022January/February 2022November/December 2021September/October 2021July/August 2021May/June 2021March/April 2021January/February 2021November/December 2020September/October 2020July/August 2020May/June 2020March/April 2020January/February 2020November/December 2019September/October 2019July/August 2019
2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016
| 2014 | 2013 | 2012
| 2010 | 2009 | 2008
| 2006 | 2005 | 2004
| 2002 | 2001 | 2000

----Find us on Facebook-Online Only:Arts of War on the Web
Book in Brief-

Basic Training Photo Gallery
Basic Training Photo Gallery
2013 & 2014 APEX® Award Winner

    Departments     University of Florida Smathers Libraries  
  - -      
  VVA logoThe VVA Veteran® is a publication of Vietnam Veterans of America. ©All rights reserved.
8719 Colesville Road, Suite 100, Silver Spring, MD 20910 | www.vva.org | contact us


Geoffrey Clifford Mark F. Erickson Chuck Forsman